- From: Lucas Pardue <Lucas.Pardue@bbc.co.uk>
- Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 19:53:36 +0000
- To: "Fossati, Thomas (Nokia - GB/Cambridge)" <thomas.fossati@nokia.com>, "Ben Schwartz" <bemasc@google.com>, Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com>
- CC: "ilariliusvaara@welho.com" <ilariliusvaara@welho.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Hi Thomas, > It looks like it'd be possible for an end user to have one security association > to the QUIC transport proxy and a separate one with the other QUIC end > that gets tunnelled through the proxy. > > Is my reading correct? > Yes that is what I had pictured. This is sometimes referred to as a "secure web proxy". Some UAs can make use of this (on TCP) by means of a Proxy auto-config (PAC) file that uses the HTTPS proxy type [1]. Regards Lucas [1] https://www.chromium.org/developers/design-documents/secure-web-proxy
Received on Sunday, 4 February 2018 19:54:03 UTC