- From: Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2018 14:43:54 +0000
- To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
- Cc: draft-ietf-httpbis-origin-frame@ietf.org, Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>, httpbis-chairs@ietf.org, mcmanus@ducksong.com, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-httpbis-origin-frame-04: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-origin-frame/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I don't object to publishing this document, but I do have an honest question. Is OCSP sufficiently robust and stable that you're expecting OCSP checks to work as a security mitigation? I remember some concerns about that in the SIP community, probably three years ago, and thought I should ask before the document is approved.
Received on Monday, 8 January 2018 16:25:06 UTC