W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2018

Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (5216)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 12:35:28 +0200
To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: ben@nostrum.com, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, adam@nostrum.com, mnot@mnot.net, pmcmanus@mozilla.com, diogin@gmail.com, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Message-ID: <6e667aad-b33b-c4bb-cf1b-a4625c5cde88@gmx.de>

On 2017-12-25 23:22, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> Reject. A target URI can be any URI scheme.
> 
> ....Roy

Alexey,

could you please update the status of this erratum to "rejected"?

Best regards, Julian

Received on Friday, 22 June 2018 10:36:22 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Alexey Melnikov: "Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (5216)"
Previous message: The IESG: "Protocol Action: 'Bootstrapping WebSockets with HTTP/2' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-httpbis-h2-websockets-07.txt)"
In reply to: [ message archived in another list or period ]
Next in thread: Alexey Melnikov: "Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (5216)"
Reply: Alexey Melnikov: "Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (5216)"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:15:21 UTC