- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 13:05:25 +0200
- To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2018-06-13 12:17, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > -------- > In message <9b4f808b-8586-d3ff-ffef-4e9fe48a725a@gmx.de>, Julian Reschke writes: > >> I would say that the incentives are exactly the same for the two >> variants. If the spec makes a mandatory requirement on the recipient >> that is easy to implement, why would implementations choose to follow it >> for SH but not for JFV? > > Because with SH somebody underqualified won't stop reading at JSON and > think he knows how this song goes and thus miss all the restrictions ? In which case it won't work anyway, because you need to do <https://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-reschke-http-jfv-08.html#rfc.section.4> to get it working at all. Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2018 11:05:56 UTC