W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2018

Re: Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-httpbis-replay-03: (with COMMENT)

From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2018 09:07:56 -0500
Message-Id: <9683F99B-1AB6-4C68-9BF9-6A293F1E4155@nostrum.com>
Cc: httpbis-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-httpbis-replay@ietf.org, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>


> On Jun 7, 2018, at 4:26 AM, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote:
> 
>> §5.2: "425 (Too Early): Are there degrees of earliness?
> 
> We've had some bikeshedding discussions on this one. I also proposed clearer
> (to me) alternatives which were longer such as "Early Data Not Acceptable",
> and in the end we really don't care since for a few decades, humans have
> stopped reading reasons. We've thought about other ones like "Unsafe" but
> it doesn't say why it's unsafe and will cause confusion if we later want
> to add other "unsafe" reasons. So let's keep the short one, especially to
> gracefully handle situations where we could expect that batches of pipelined
> requests would get rejected at once.

Apologies, I meant to put a “ :-)” on this comment :-)

Otherwise, your responses all look good to me.

Ben.

Received on Thursday, 7 June 2018 14:08:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:15:21 UTC