W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2018

Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-replay-03, "5.1. The Early-Data Header Field"

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 07:00:19 +0200
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Cc: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <7569d419-7acd-db65-214f-17bdb562f71a@gmx.de>
On 2018-05-14 00:45, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> ...
>>>   And I'm OK with that in this case.  Were we to cite structured headers, we
>>> would probably want to call out that direct contravention.
> My assumption was that if this spec were using SH, you wouldn't need to say anything beyond 'this is the structure we expect:...".
> ...

Agreed. If we need a special case for something simple like that, one of 
the two specs needs to change.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 14 May 2018 05:01:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:59 UTC