On 2018-05-14 00:45, Mark Nottingham wrote: > ... >>> And I'm OK with that in this case. Were we to cite structured headers, we >>> would probably want to call out that direct contravention. > > My assumption was that if this spec were using SH, you wouldn't need to say anything beyond 'this is the structure we expect:...". > ... Agreed. If we need a special case for something simple like that, one of the two specs needs to change. Best regards, JulianReceived on Monday, 14 May 2018 05:01:16 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:59 UTC