On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 12:41:25PM +1000, Mark Nottingham wrote: > This sounds like a fine resolution. > > Just to make sure that Structured Headers is fit for purpose (i.e., not trying to get adoption here!), *if* this header were based upon SH, would its current design be adequate? > > I think so, just want to make sure. I think so as well. WillyReceived on Sunday, 13 May 2018 04:39:19 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:59 UTC