W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2018

Re: Working Group Last Call: Bootstrapping WebSockets with HTTP/2

From: Loïc Hoguin <essen@ninenines.eu>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2018 16:17:34 +0200
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Cc: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
Message-ID: <a05bf0d9-9426-84c0-09b2-9f9ed8e0dadc@ninenines.eu>
On 03/28/2018 11:48 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> 
> Patrick (as editor) has incorporated the discussion from London and believes this is ready for WGLC; there are no open issues.
> 
> Please have a look at:
>    https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-h2-websockets-01
> 
> ... and bring up any issues on-list or on its issues list; likewise statements of support (or otherwise) for publication on-list would be appreciated.

Hello,

I am finalizing a server implementation. Just tried it against Chrome 
and things work as intended, with and without permessage-deflate.

I was a little surprised to see that the value for 
SETTINGS_ENABLE_CONNECT_PROTOCOL (0x8) is only defined in the IANA 
considerations.

I would +1 the need for some language on the END_STREAM flag, including 
how endpoints should behave when END_STREAM (or RST_STREAM) is sent on 
the stream without a close frame. I assume it's the same behavior as if 
an HTTP/1.1 Websocket connection was improperly closed but it would be 
nice to have confirmation.

Thanks for the great spec!

Cheers,

-- 
Loïc Hoguin
https://ninenines.eu
Received on Tuesday, 3 April 2018 14:18:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:15:20 UTC