- From: Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 00:59:40 +0000
- To: Mike Bishop <mbishop@evequefou.be>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 19 December 2017 01:00:18 UTC
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 10:42 AM Mike Bishop <mbishop@evequefou.be> wrote: > ... The advantage of your current scheme is that you can preserve the > original order of the headers in the signature, meaning a client could > detect changes / reconstruct them. I’m not sure how critical that is, but > this is the right list to give feedback on the semantic content of header > ordering…. > > Pulling this out to its own thread since it's more general than the signed-exchange proposal: Is the order of HTTP headers semantically significant? Should future proposals be careful to preserve header order, or is it ok to do things like sort headers while processing them? Thanks, Jeffrey
Received on Tuesday, 19 December 2017 01:00:18 UTC