Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-structured-headers-00.txt

On 5 Nov. 2017 12:27 pm, "Andy Green" <andy@warmcat.com> wrote:


So maybe that should be recognized, that things wanting to use this new
standard may choose not to be able to internalize the values that come, but
they must all be able to judge them as able to be internalized or not.


Those who want to use this new standard are authors of new header field
values, not implementers (who have to honour the header field's definition
no matter how it's specified.)

And not all new header fields need to use this standard.

Cheers
-- 
Matthew Kerwin