- From: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 17:50:31 +0100
- To: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAOdDvNrvpyAHwoh7=386OGipNdv7c7hy4-GG0irn9qJWph+t9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Mark, httpbis friends, Based on feedback HTTPbis will be adopting this document. Mark, please submit a wg -00 to the data tracker. If you'd like to add to the traditional http-extensions github repo, please do in the usual way. If you'd rather do something else please start the discussion. Thanks all! On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 7:51 PM, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com> wrote: > Folks, I'm going to open up a 2 week call for adoption period to see if > the group has consensus for adopting work on a bis version of BCP56 (aka > RFC 3205; On the use of HTTP as a Substrate). > > Mark introduced this work both on the general ART list and with a > presentation at IETF 99. > > His draft, which is the subject of the adoption call, can be found > https://mnot.github.io/I-D/bcp56bis/ > > The ART discussion is archived here: https://www.ietf.org/mail- > archive/web/art/current/msg00303.html > > The presentation at IETF 99 is here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/99/materials/slides- > 99-httpbis-sessb-bcp56bis/ (That's a pdf - trust your content-types!) > > The minutes from IETF 99 are here: https://tools.ietf.org/wg/ > httpbis/minutes?item=minutes-99-httpbis-00.html > > Personally, I think this is an important document to update, and > contemporaneous efforts like JMAP and DOH illustrate the relevancy. > > We'll leave the CfA open until October 27. I'm looking for arguments pro > or con and especially expressions of interest in collaborating and > reviewing the document. Thanks. Please weigh in. > > -Patrick > >
Received on Friday, 3 November 2017 16:51:01 UTC