Re: DRAFT - HTTPtre scope of work

> On 10 Oct 2017, at 9:22 am, Lucas Pardue <Lucas.Pardue@bbc.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> Hi Mark,
> 
> A couple of points, apologies if these have already been asked/discussed:
> 
> 1) Is the intention to carry out the work in this WG, or form a new HTTPtre WG?

Same WG.

> 2) In Julian's presentation at IETF 99, it was proposed to include in scope the resolution of GitHub issues. Is this implicit in your text (points 3 or 5?), or have they been explicitly left out?

It's implied in those points, yes. Each issue will be judged on a case-by-case basis (see proposed criteria).

Cheers,

> 
> Regards
> Lucas
> 
> 
> -----------------------------
> http://www.bbc.co.uk
> This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and
> may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
> If you have received it in
> error, please delete it from your system.
> Do not use, copy or disclose the
> information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender
> immediately.
> Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails
> sent or received.
> Further communication will signify your consent to
> this.
> -----------------------------

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

Received on Tuesday, 10 October 2017 16:24:48 UTC