Re: Clarification on Alternative Service Connection Failures

On 29/09/17 14:27, Patrick McManus wrote:
> The text is referring to any failure - the client MAY want to try a
> different alternative in that case. Its just saying don't feel pinned
> down by an Alt-Svc announcement just because you started to use it - you
> can always use a different one (or the default) if you think it would
> work better. A 500 seems a reasonable input to that choice to me.

Thanks for the clarification, that's exactly what I thought but just
wanted to make sure.


Received on Friday, 29 September 2017 13:34:08 UTC