Re: Working Group Last Call The ORIGIN HTTP/2 Frame

I'm OK either way here; it's attractive to have a deadline for knowing whether the connection is under the ORIGIN model (first SETTINGS), but I'm also a bit nervous about introducing such a big change relatively late in the day.

Put another way - does anyone think that this is clearly better than the current spec and needs to get in?

PR here (still needs some work if we want to adopt):

> On 28 Sep 2017, at 11:48 am, Martin Thomson <> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Patrick McManus <> wrote:
>> I'm not going to object to the setting - it just seems it doesn't really
>> address the fact that the client is going to see both 7540 rules and ORIGIN
>> rules at some point on the same connection so there's not a lot of point to
>> it imo.
> I see your point.  It narrows, but doesn't eliminate the window of
> uncertainty and as a result it isn't that much use to you.

Mark Nottingham

Received on Thursday, 28 September 2017 02:24:22 UTC