- From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 10:38:42 -0700
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+9kkMCmzbGhCnm5vJotOK7YV09WmQ9vZSnmRjXcdx86B3sMtQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 9:22 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > This may be of interest to some here: > > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/9OQ5neWB > _bhhIG1RjJjEIAxJ7_A > > Also possibly of interest is Warren's follow-up: After the IETF LC was started the authors became aware that their > employer might possibly have some IPR associated with this document. > They are checking with their legal team to determine if this is the > case, and will file the necessary disclosures if there is. > > I felt I should make the community aware, and also wanted to > explicitly thank the authors for giving us a heads up. > > Warren. > regards, Ted > > The IESG has received a request from the IPv6 Operations WG (v6ops) to > > consider the following document: - 'Happy Eyeballs Version 2: Better > > Connectivity Using Concurrency' > > <draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc6555bis-05.txt> as Proposed Standard > > > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits > final > > comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > > > > ietf@ietf.org > > mailing lists by 2017-09-26. Exceptionally, comments may be > > sent to > > iesg@ietf.org > > instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of > > the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > > > Abstract > > > > > > Many communication protocols operated over the modern Internet use > > host names. These often resolve to multiple IP addresses, each of > > which may have different performance and connectivity > > characteristics. Since specific addresses or address families (IPv4 > > or IPv6) may be blocked, broken, or sub-optimal on a network, clients > > that attempt multiple connections in parallel have a higher chance of > > establishing a connection sooner. This document specifies > > requirements for algorithms that reduce this user-visible delay and > > provides an example algorithm. > > > > > > > > > > The file can be obtained via > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc6555bis/ > > > > > > IESG discussion can be tracked via > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc6555bis/ballot/ > > > > > > > > No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. > > > > > > > -- > Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ > > > >
Received on Monday, 18 September 2017 17:39:40 UTC