W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2017

Origin-signed responses

From: Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin@google.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2017 09:35:27 -0700
Message-ID: <CANh-dXkbqBpGUrr-dXceQ5HzDjC6mSrrudTKjWwaBQcSO584ug@mail.gmail.com>
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Hi all,

When I brought web packaging to IETF99 DISPATCH
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-99-dispatch/), several
people said they wanted to see what it would look like split into
layers. https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-yasskin-http-origin-signed-responses-00.html
discusses use cases and an outline of what the signing layer needs to
look like, but doesn't include an actual proposal for signatures yet.

What do you think? Is splitting the packaging proposal still the right approach?

I've also started a thread in art@ to talk about the packaging use
cases overall: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/gaS8EHxsdzcyPCaSqSyWSh-WbMY

Received on Friday, 1 September 2017 16:36:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:15:08 UTC