- From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 07:07:47 +0200
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 03:01:26PM +1000, Martin Thomson wrote: > If you don't actually have trailers, I would send an empty DATA + ES. > That is (to my knowledge) perfectly interoperable. Great, that's perfect, thanks! > I'll let others speak about how well tested an empty HEADERS is, but > there's an important difference in the semantics if you use that. As > soon as you send HEADERS with ES, you declare the presence of > trailers. That they are empty is potentially confusing. That's what I fear as well. I'd rather decide to always emit an empty DATA+ES whenever I'd like to send an empty HEADERS if it's less risky. Thank you for the fast response! Willy
Received on Friday, 4 August 2017 05:08:11 UTC