- From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 13:42:23 -0700
- To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
- Cc: draft-ietf-httpbis-immutable@ietf.org, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, httpbis-chairs@ietf.org, mnot@mnot.net, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-httpbis-immutable-03: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-immutable/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Presumably, the "Note to Readers" section should be removed prior to publication. Please either remove it, add a note to it that it should be removed, or add an RFC editor note to this effect. Trivial nits that aren't worth re-spinning the document before, but which you may wish to consider if you have any other reasons to revise it: - Put quotation marks around "immutable" in the abstract. - Replace "assures" with "insures" in the abstract (or rephase along the lines of "...assures the client that it never..."). - In the third paragraph of the Introduction, replace "Users that..." with "Users who..." - The cache control registry currently contains section numbers for every citation. Would update section 4 to indicate: "[this document, section 2]"
Received on Monday, 31 July 2017 20:42:46 UTC