- From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 07:14:59 +0200
- To: Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusvaara@welho.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Hi Mike, On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 05:16:42PM +0000, Mike Bishop wrote: > No, because that would prohibit ridiculously large trailers (i.e. using > CONTINUATION), which might be stupid but are permitted. The spec is saying > that any HEADERS frame after the final status code has to be trailers, and > therefore that block is the last thing on the stream. Alternatively stated, > you can't send your trailers but then send more body. Thanks, now I understand my mistake. I did not realize that the ES bit had to be put on the HEADERS frame even if there are CONTINUATION frames but now I found where it's mentionned and all of this makes sense. It'll require some changes to my state machine, but that's exactly why I prefered to be sure to be able to deal with CONTINUATION frames from the start ;-) Cheers, Willy
Received on Tuesday, 25 July 2017 05:15:25 UTC