- From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 19:28:04 +0200 (CEST)
- To: Emily Stark <estark@google.com>
- cc: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>, Nick Sullivan <nicholas.sullivan@gmail.com>, Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusvaara@welho.com>, Erik Nygren <erik@nygren.org>, Piotr Sikora <piotrsikora@google.com>, Ryan Hamilton <rch@google.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Emily Stark wrote: > Is it reasonable to assume that all clients implementing ORIGIN will also > implement CT? I think that's a stretch. It is easy to see how supporting ORIGIN can be an obvious benefit to a lot of libraries and tools (ie non-browsers) that want to coalesce/reuse connections better and that might very well be implemented without doing CT or at least independently of it. -- / daniel.haxx.se
Received on Monday, 17 July 2017 17:28:44 UTC