Friday, 30 December 2016
Sunday, 25 December 2016
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt
- Re: Call for Adoption -- Cache-Control: immutable
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
Saturday, 24 December 2016
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00 for general structured data
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, identifier, h1_blob
- draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, identifier, h1_blob
- Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00 for general structured data
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00 for general structured data
Friday, 23 December 2016
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00 for general structured data
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00 for general structured data
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00 for general structured data
- Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
- Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
- Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
- [ietf-http-wg] <none>
- Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
- Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt
- Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
- Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
- (rephrasing, sorry for duplicate) | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding
- Re: New versions of encryption drafts
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-06.txt
Thursday, 22 December 2016
- Re: Expectations for TLS session reuse
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00 for general structured data
- Re: Expectations for TLS session reuse
- RE: Expectations for TLS session reuse
- draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00 for general structured data
- Re: Expectations for TLS session reuse
- Re: Expectations for TLS session reuse
- Re: Expectations for TLS session reuse
- Re: New versions of encryption drafts
- draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding
- New versions of encryption drafts
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-09.txt
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-05.txt
Wednesday, 21 December 2016
- Re: Expectations for TLS session reuse
- Re: Expectations for TLS session reuse
- RE: Expectations for TLS session reuse
- Re: Expectations for TLS session reuse
- Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
Tuesday, 20 December 2016
Monday, 19 December 2016
- Call For Adoption Live Byte Ranges
- Fwd: Last Call: <draft-murchison-webdav-prefer-11.txt> (Use of the Prefer Header Field in Web Distributed Authoring and Versioning (WebDAV)) to Proposed Standard
Saturday, 17 December 2016
Friday, 16 December 2016
- [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4891)
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
Thursday, 15 December 2016
- Re: Call for Adoption: Expect-CT
- Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
- Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
- Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
- Re: Call for Adoption: Expect-CT
Wednesday, 14 December 2016
- Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
- Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
- Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
- Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
- Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
- Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
- Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
- Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
- Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
- Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
- Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
- Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
- Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
- Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
- Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
- Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
- Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
- Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
- Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
- Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt
Tuesday, 13 December 2016
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
- RE: Expectations for TLS session reuse
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
- Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
- draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
- RE: Expectations for TLS session reuse
- Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
- Re: Call for Adoption: Expect-CT
- Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt
Monday, 12 December 2016
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00.txt
- Re: Expectations for TLS session reuse
- Re: Call for Adoption: Expect-CT
- RE: Expectations for TLS session reuse
- RE: Expectations for TLS session reuse
Saturday, 10 December 2016
Friday, 9 December 2016
- Re: Expectations for TLS session reuse
- Re: Call for Adoption -- Cache-Control: immutable
- Re: Call for Adoption: Expect-CT
- Re: Expectations for TLS session reuse
- RE: Expectations for TLS session reuse
- Expectations for TLS session reuse
- Re: COPY: "Duplicate" functionality
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt
- Re: Call for Adoption -- Cache-Control: immutable
Thursday, 8 December 2016
- RE: Call for Adoption -- Cache-Control: immutable
- Re: rs parameter in encrypted content coding
- rs parameter in encrypted content coding
- Re: How to handle content-encoding
- Re: Call for Adoption: Expect-CT
- Re: JFV and Common Structure specifications
- Re: Call for Adoption -- Cache-Control: immutable
- Re: JFV and Common Structure specifications
- RE: Call for Adoption -- Cache-Control: immutable
- Re: Call for Adoption: Expect-CT
- Re: Call for Adoption: Expect-CT
- Call for Adoption: Expect-CT
- Call for Adoption -- Cache-Control: immutable
- Call for Adoption: Early Hints (103)
Wednesday, 7 December 2016
Tuesday, 6 December 2016
Monday, 5 December 2016
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt
- Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
- Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
- Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
- Re: A question about RFC7232#2.2.2
- Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
- Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt
- Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
- Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
- Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
- Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
Sunday, 4 December 2016
Saturday, 3 December 2016
Friday, 2 December 2016
- Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
- Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
- Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
- Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
- A question about RFC7232#2.2.2
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt
- Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt
- Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
- Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
- Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
- Re: Comments on draft-stark-expect-ct-00
- Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
- Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
- Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
- Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
- Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
- Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
- Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
- Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
- Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
- Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
- Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
- Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
- Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
- Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
- Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
- Re: HTTP/2 examples SHOULD use :authority
Thursday, 1 December 2016
- Re: HTTP/2 examples SHOULD use :authority
- Re: HTTP/2 examples SHOULD use :authority
- Re: HTTP/2 examples SHOULD use :authority
- Re: HTTP/2 examples SHOULD use :authority
- HTTP/2 examples SHOULD use :authority
- 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
- Re: Question about resource and representation
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
Wednesday, 30 November 2016
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
- Re: Additional comments on draft-stark-expect-ct-00
- Re: Early Hints (103)
- RE: Early Hints (103)
- RE: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
- RE: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
- Re: Question about prioritization state management
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
Tuesday, 29 November 2016
Wednesday, 30 November 2016
Tuesday, 29 November 2016
Monday, 28 November 2016
- Re: Comments on draft-stark-expect-ct-00
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-site-wide-headers-01.txt
- Re: [expect-ct] Is expect-ct policy intended for long-term use? (plus: no user recourse)
- Re: Live Byte Ranges
- Re: Live Byte Ranges
Sunday, 27 November 2016
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-site-wide-headers-01.txt
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-site-wide-headers-01.txt
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
Saturday, 26 November 2016
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-site-wide-headers-01.txt
- Re: [expect-ct] Is expect-ct policy intended for long-term use? (plus: no user recourse)
Friday, 25 November 2016
- Re: Comments on draft-stark-expect-ct-00
- Re: RIP: Crypto-Key header field
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
- CT-Policy (was: Comments on draft-stark-expect-ct-00)
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-site-wide-headers-01.txt
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-site-wide-headers-01.txt
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
- Re: Early Hints (103)
- [expect-ct] Is expect-ct policy intended for long-term use? (plus: no user recourse)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-site-wide-headers-01.txt
- Re: CT-Policy (was: Comments on draft-stark-expect-ct-00)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-site-wide-headers-01.txt
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-site-wide-headers-01.txt
- Re: RIP: Crypto-Key header field
Thursday, 24 November 2016
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
- Re: Early Hints (103)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-site-wide-headers-01.txt
- Re: CT-Policy (was: Comments on draft-stark-expect-ct-00)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-site-wide-headers-01.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-site-wide-headers-01.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-site-wide-headers-01.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-site-wide-headers-01.txt
- Re: Early Hints (103)
- Re: RIP: Crypto-Key header field
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-site-wide-headers-01.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-site-wide-headers-01.txt
- Re: CT-Policy (was: Comments on draft-stark-expect-ct-00)
- Re: CT-Policy (was: Comments on draft-stark-expect-ct-00)
- Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-site-wide-headers-01.txt
- Re: Early Hints (103)
- Re: CT-Policy (was: Comments on draft-stark-expect-ct-00)
- Re: [expect-ct] Is expect-ct policy intended for long-term use? (plus: no user recourse)
- Additional comments on draft-stark-expect-ct-00
- [expect-ct] Is expect-ct policy intended for long-term use? (plus: no user recourse)
- Re: CT-Policy (was: Comments on draft-stark-expect-ct-00)
Wednesday, 23 November 2016
- Re: RIP: Crypto-Key header field
- Re: JFV and Common Structure specifications
- Re: JFV and Common Structure specifications
- Re: JFV and Common Structure specifications
- Re: Early Hints (103)
- Re: JFV and Common Structure specifications
- Re: Live Byte Ranges
- Re: Early Hints (103)
- Re: Early Hints (103)
- Re: Live Byte Ranges
- Re: RIP: Crypto-Key header field
- Re: JFV and Common Structure specifications
- Re: RIP: Crypto-Key header field
- Re: JFV and Common Structure specifications
- Re: JFV and Common Structure specifications
- Re: RIP: Crypto-Key header field
Tuesday, 22 November 2016
- Live Byte Ranges
- Early Hints (103)
- Re: Via header specification bug
- Via header specification bug
- Re: JFV and Common Structure specifications
- Re: RIP: Crypto-Key header field
- Re: JFV and Common Structure specifications
- Re: JFV and Common Structure specifications
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
- Re: Mixed schemes
Monday, 21 November 2016
- Re: JFV and Common Structure specifications
- Re: Comments on draft-stark-expect-ct-00
- Re: Mixed schemes
- Re: Client hints: Add support for hinting Display Gamut / Color Profile
- Re: JFV and Common Structure specifications
- Re: Client hints: Add support for hinting Display Gamut / Color Profile
- Re: RIP: Crypto-Key header field
- RIP: Crypto-Key header field
- Re: Question about resource and representation
- Re: Client hints: Add support for hinting Display Gamut / Color Profile
- Re: ORIGIN Frame document
- Re: JFV and Common Structure specifications
- Re: Mixed schemes
- Mixed schemes
- ORIGIN Frame document
- JFV and Common Structure specifications
Sunday, 20 November 2016
Friday, 18 November 2016
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
- Rough minutes for IETF97
Thursday, 17 November 2016
- Re: RFC 5987bis WG last call - naming the encoding
- Re: RFC 5987bis WG last call - naming the encoding
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-01.txt (fwd)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-01.txt (fwd)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-01.txt (fwd)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-01.txt (fwd)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-01.txt (fwd)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-01.txt (fwd)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-01.txt (fwd)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-01.txt (fwd)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-01.txt (fwd)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-01.txt (fwd)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-01.txt (fwd)
- Re: RFC 5987bis WG last call - naming the encoding
- Re: RFC 5987bis WG last call - naming the encoding
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-01.txt (fwd)
- RFC 5987bis WG last call - naming the encoding
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-01.txt (fwd)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-01.txt (fwd)
Wednesday, 16 November 2016
Tuesday, 15 November 2016
- Re: rfc5987bis and common structure | Re: New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-00.txt (fwd)
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03.txt
- Re: Encryption simplification
- Re: feedback on draft-murchison-webdav-prefer-09
- Re: feedback on draft-murchison-webdav-prefer-09
- Re: feedback on draft-murchison-webdav-prefer-09
- Re: feedback on draft-murchison-webdav-prefer-09
- Re: feedback on draft-murchison-webdav-prefer-09
- Re: Comments on draft-stark-expect-ct-00
- Re: Question about resource and representation
- Reminder: HTTPbis WG meeting in ~1.75 hours
- Re: Comments on draft-stark-expect-ct-00
Monday, 14 November 2016
- Re: feedback on draft-murchison-webdav-prefer-09
- Re: feedback on draft-murchison-webdav-prefer-09
- Re: Comments on draft-stark-expect-ct-00
- Re: feedback on draft-murchison-webdav-prefer-09
- Re: feedback on draft-murchison-webdav-prefer-09
- Re: feedback on draft-murchison-webdav-prefer-09
- Re: feedback on draft-murchison-webdav-prefer-09
- Re: feedback on draft-murchison-webdav-prefer-09
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
- FW: New Version Notification for draft-pratt-httpbis-rand-access-live-00.txt
- Re: Question about resource and representation
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
- Re: Question about resource and representation
- RE: Question about resource and representation
- feedback on draft-murchison-webdav-prefer-09
- Question about resource and representation
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
- Re: Comments on draft-stark-expect-ct-00
Sunday, 13 November 2016
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
- Re: Comments on draft-stark-expect-ct-00
- Re: Comments on draft-stark-expect-ct-00
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
Saturday, 12 November 2016
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-04
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-04
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-04
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-04
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-04
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-04
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-04
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-04
- Comments on draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-04
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
Friday, 11 November 2016
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-01.txt (fwd)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-01.txt (fwd)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
Thursday, 10 November 2016
Tuesday, 8 November 2016
Thursday, 10 November 2016
- Re: 2.2. Interaction with "https" URIs | Re: Op-sec simplification
- Comments on draft-stark-expect-ct-00
Tuesday, 8 November 2016
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
- Re: ID for Immutable
Monday, 7 November 2016
- Re: ID for Immutable
- RE: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
Saturday, 5 November 2016
Friday, 4 November 2016
- Re: 2.2. Interaction with "https" URIs | Re: Op-sec simplification
- Re: 2.2. Interaction with "https" URIs | Re: Op-sec simplification
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-vkrasnov-h2-compression-dictionaries-01.txt
Thursday, 3 November 2016
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
- Re: [dnsoverhttp] Bar BOF in Seoul and Mailing List - DNS over HTTP ideas
- Re: 2.2. Interaction with "https" URIs | Re: Op-sec simplification
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
- RE: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-vkrasnov-h2-compression-dictionaries-01.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-vkrasnov-h2-compression-dictionaries-01.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-vkrasnov-h2-compression-dictionaries-01.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-vkrasnov-h2-compression-dictionaries-01.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-vkrasnov-h2-compression-dictionaries-01.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-vkrasnov-h2-compression-dictionaries-01.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-vkrasnov-h2-compression-dictionaries-01.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-vkrasnov-h2-compression-dictionaries-01.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-vkrasnov-h2-compression-dictionaries-01.txt
Wednesday, 2 November 2016
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-vkrasnov-h2-compression-dictionaries-01.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
- Re: 2.2. Interaction with "https" URIs | Re: Op-sec simplification
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-vkrasnov-h2-compression-dictionaries-01.txt
- FW: New Version Notification for draft-eriksson-http-resource-map-00.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-vkrasnov-h2-compression-dictionaries-01.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-vkrasnov-h2-compression-dictionaries-01.txt
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
- RE: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-vkrasnov-h2-compression-dictionaries-01.txt
- Re: 2.2. Interaction with "https" URIs | Re: Op-sec simplification
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
- Re: 2.2. Interaction with "https" URIs | Re: Op-sec simplification
- Re: 2.2. Interaction with "https" URIs | Re: Op-sec simplification
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-04.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-vkrasnov-h2-compression-dictionaries-01.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-04, "4.1 Encryption of a Response"
- Re: Op-sec simplification
- Re: 2.2. Interaction with "https" URIs | Re: Op-sec simplification
Tuesday, 1 November 2016
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
- RE: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
- Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-vkrasnov-h2-compression-dictionaries-01.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
- Re: Op-sec simplification
- RE: Op-sec simplification
- RE: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
- 2.2. Interaction with "https" URIs | Re: Op-sec simplification
- Re: Draft HTTPbis Agenda For Seoul IETF 97
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-04.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
- draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-04, "4.1 Encryption of a Response"
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
- Re: Op-sec simplification
- Re: Op-sec simplification
- Re: COPY: "Duplicate" functionality
- Re: Op-sec simplification
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-digest-01.txt
- Re: Draft HTTPbis Agenda For Seoul IETF 97
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
- Re: Op-sec simplification
- FW: New Version Notification for draft-bishop-httpbis-http2-additional-certs-02.txt
Monday, 31 October 2016
- Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-digest-01.txt
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-digest-01.txt
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-04.txt
- Re: Op-sec simplification
- RE: Op-sec simplification
- Re: Op-sec simplification
- Re: Op-sec simplification
- Re: Encryption simplification
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-08.txt
- Re: Op-sec simplification
- Re: Op-sec simplification
- RE: Op-sec simplification
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
- Re: Encryption simplification
- Re: COPY: "Duplicate" functionality
- Re: Encryption simplification
- COPY: "Duplicate" functionality
- Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
- Re: Encryption simplification
- Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
- Re: Encryption simplification
- Re: Op-sec simplification
- Re: Encryption simplification
- Re: Encryption simplification
- Re: Op-sec simplification
- Re: Is “fr, en; q=0.3” a valid Accept-Language value?
- Re: Is “fr, en; q=0.3” a valid Accept-Language value?
Sunday, 30 October 2016
Monday, 31 October 2016
Sunday, 30 October 2016
- Re: Encryption simplification
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
- Re: Encryption simplification
- Re: Encryption simplification
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
- Re: Is “fr, en; q=0.3” a valid Accept-Language value?
- Re: Encryption simplification
- Re: Is “fr, en; q=0.3” a valid Accept-Language value?
- Encryption simplification
- Re: Is “fr, en; q=0.3” a valid Accept-Language value?
- Re: Is “fr, en; q=0.3” a valid Accept-Language value?
- Re: ID for Immutable
- Re: ID for Immutable
Saturday, 29 October 2016
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
- Re: ID for Immutable
- Re: ID for Immutable
- Re: ID for Immutable
- Re: ID for Immutable
- Re: ID for Immutable
- Re: ID for Immutable
- Re: ID for Immutable
Friday, 28 October 2016
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
- Re: ID for Immutable
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
- Re: ID for Immutable
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
- Re: ID for Immutable
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
- Re: ID for Immutable
- Re: ID for Immutable
- Re: ID for Immutable
- Re: ID for Immutable
- Re: ID for Immutable
- Re: ID for Immutable
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
- Re: ID for Immutable
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
Thursday, 27 October 2016
- Re: ID for Immutable
- Re: FYI: JSON parsing
- Re: FYI: JSON parsing
- Re: FYI: JSON parsing
- Re: FYI: JSON parsing
- Re: FYI: JSON parsing
- Re: FYI: JSON parsing
- Re: FYI: JSON parsing
- Re: FYI: JSON parsing
- Re: ID for Immutable
- Re: ID for Immutable
- Re: FYI: JSON parsing
- FYI: JSON parsing
- Re: ID for Immutable
- Fwd: [QUIC] First Interim planning -- availability poll
- Re: ID for Immutable
Wednesday, 26 October 2016
- Re: ID for Immutable
- RE: ID for Immutable
- Re: ID for Immutable
- ID for Immutable
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4839)
Tuesday, 25 October 2016
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
Sunday, 23 October 2016
Monday, 24 October 2016
Sunday, 23 October 2016
- [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4839)
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4838)
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4838)
Saturday, 22 October 2016
- [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4838)
- Fwd: httpbis - Requested sessions have been scheduled for IETF 97
Friday, 21 October 2016
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
Thursday, 20 October 2016
- Re: 2nd Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03.txt
- Re: Re: Quick review for draft-svirid-websocket2-over-http2 (Was: Re: Draft HTTPbis Agenda For Seoul IETF 97)
- Re: Re: Quick review for draft-svirid-websocket2-over-http2 (Was: Re: Draft HTTPbis Agenda For Seoul IETF 97)
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
- Re: Bar BOF in Seoul and Mailing List - DNS over HTTP ideas
- Re: Draft HTTPbis Agenda For Seoul IETF 97
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
- Re: Re: Quick review for draft-svirid-websocket2-over-http2 (Was: Re: Draft HTTPbis Agenda For Seoul IETF 97)
- Re: Draft HTTPbis Agenda For Seoul IETF 97
- WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
- Re: Quick review for draft-svirid-websocket2-over-http2 (Was: Re: Draft HTTPbis Agenda For Seoul IETF 97)
- Re: 2nd Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03.txt
- Re: Quick review for draft-svirid-websocket2-over-http2 (Was: Re: Draft HTTPbis Agenda For Seoul IETF 97)
- Re: 2nd Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03.txt
- Re: Quick review for draft-svirid-websocket2-over-http2 (Was: Re: Draft HTTPbis Agenda For Seoul IETF 97)
- Re: Quick review for draft-svirid-websocket2-over-http2 (Was: Re: Draft HTTPbis Agenda For Seoul IETF 97)
Wednesday, 19 October 2016
- Quick review for draft-svirid-websocket2-over-http2 (Was: Re: Draft HTTPbis Agenda For Seoul IETF 97)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
- Re: 2nd Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03.txt
- Re: 2nd Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03.txt
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
- Re: 2nd Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03.txt
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
- Re: Draft HTTPbis Agenda For Seoul IETF 97
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
- Re: 2nd Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03.txt
- Re: Draft HTTPbis Agenda For Seoul IETF 97
- Re: Is “fr, en; q=0.3” a valid Accept-Language value?
- Re: Is “fr, en; q=0.3” a valid Accept-Language value?
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
- Re: 2nd Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03.txt
- Re: Is “fr, en; q=0.3” a valid Accept-Language value?
- Re: 2nd Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03.txt
- Re: 2nd Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03.txt
- Re: 2nd Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03.txt
- Is “fr, en; q=0.3” a valid Accept-Language value?
Tuesday, 18 October 2016
Monday, 17 October 2016
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
- RE: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
- Re: HTTP Content-Location header usage
- Fwd: Multipath TCP at the IETF'97 Hackathon and the httpbis WG
- Fwd: I-D Action: draft-murchison-webdav-prefer-09.txt
- Re: HTTP Content-Location header usage
- Re: Http header including if ECMA (Javascript) is on and the version
Sunday, 16 October 2016
Saturday, 15 October 2016
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
- Fwd: Http header including if ECMA (Javascript) is on and the version
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
- Re: Working Group Last Call: RFC5987bis
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
- Re: WGLC comment on draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03, was: Encryption content coding simplification
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
- Re: draft-kamp-httpbis-structure | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
- Re: Common structure | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03.txt
- Re: rfc5987bis and common structure | Re: New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-00.txt (fwd)
- Re: Working Group Last Call: RFC5987bis
- Re: rfc5987bis and common structure | Re: New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-00.txt (fwd)
- draft-kamp-httpbis-structure | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
- Re: rfc5987bis and common structure | Re: New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-00.txt (fwd)
- rfc5987bis and common structure | Re: New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-00.txt (fwd)
- Re: WGLC comment on draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03, was: Encryption content coding simplification
- Common structure | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03.txt
Friday, 14 October 2016
Thursday, 13 October 2016
Friday, 14 October 2016
- Re: WGLC comment on draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03, was: Encryption content coding simplification
- Re: WGLC comment on draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03, was: Encryption content coding simplification
Thursday, 13 October 2016
- Re: WGLC comment on draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03, was: Encryption content coding simplification
- RE: WGLC comment on draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03, was: Encryption content coding simplification
- draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03 in Java
- Re: SETTINGS_WEBSOCKET_CAPABLE | Re: WebSocket2
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-02, "2.2.1 Advertising Support for Client Hints"
- Re: WebSocket2
- Re: WebSocket HTTP2
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-02, "2.2.1 Advertising Support for Client Hints"
- Working Group Last Call: RFC5987bis
- RE: WebSocket2
- Re: 2nd Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03.txt
Wednesday, 12 October 2016
Thursday, 13 October 2016
- Re: WebSocket2
- Re: WGLC comment on draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03, was: Encryption content coding simplification
- WGLC comment on draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03, was: Encryption content coding simplification
- Re: SETTINGS_WEBSOCKET_CAPABLE | Re: WebSocket2
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-00.txt (fwd)
- Re: draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-00 comments
- Re: draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-00 comments
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-00.txt (fwd)
Wednesday, 12 October 2016
- Re: HTTP Hackathon at IETF Seoul -- Saturday and Sunday before
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
- spacing on lists | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-00.txt
Tuesday, 11 October 2016
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis-03.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-00.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-00.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-00.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-00.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-00.txt
- Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-00.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-00.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03.txt
- Re: draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-00 comments
- 2nd Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03.txt
- Re: #227: Encoding advice for new headers and parameters
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03.txt
- Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-00.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-00.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-00.txt
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-00.txt
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-00.txt
Monday, 10 October 2016
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03.txt
- draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-00 comments
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03.txt
- Re: 2.2. Interaction with "https" URIs | Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
- Re: 2.2. Interaction with "https" URIs | Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03.txt
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03.txt
- Re: 2.2. Interaction with "https" URIs | Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
- Re: 2.2. Interaction with "https" URIs | Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
Sunday, 9 October 2016
- Re: 2.2. Interaction with "https" URIs | Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
- 2.2. Interaction with "https" URIs | Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
Saturday, 8 October 2016
- The Downlink Client Hint | Re: Http header including if ECMA (Javascript) is on and the version
- Re: Http header including if ECMA (Javascript) is on and the version
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
- Re: Http header including if ECMA (Javascript) is on and the version
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
Friday, 7 October 2016
- [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7230 (4779)
- [Errata Verified] RFC7230 (4667)
- [Errata Verified] RFC7230 (4825)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-02, "2.2.1 Advertising Support for Client Hints"
- Http header including if ECMA (Javascript) is on and the version
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
- Re: WebSocket2
- Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
- draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-02 nits
- draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-02, "2.2.1 Advertising Support for Client Hints"
- draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-02, "11. References"
- Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
- Re: Empty but existing resource | Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
- Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
- Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
- Re: Empty but existing resource | Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
- Re: Empty but existing resource | Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
- Empty but existing resource | Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
- Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
Thursday, 6 October 2016
- RE: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
- draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
- Re: #227: Encoding advice for new headers and parameters
- Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
- Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
- Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
- Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
- Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
Wednesday, 5 October 2016
- Re: RFC6265bis status
- Re: RFC6265bis status
- Re: RFC6265bis status
- Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
- RE: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
- Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
- RE: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
- Re: RFC6265bis status
- Re: WebSocket2
- Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
- Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
- New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-00.txt (fwd)
- Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
- Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
- Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
- SETTINGS_WEBSOCKET_CAPABLE | Re: WebSocket2
- Re: RFC6265bis status
- Re: RFC6265bis status
- Re: WebSocket2
- SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
- Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-02
- Re: WebSocket2
- RFC6265bis status
- Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-02
- Re: tunnel | Re: WebSocket2
Tuesday, 4 October 2016
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-02.txt
- RE: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
- tunnel | Re: WebSocket2
- Opportunistic Security for HTTP
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
- Re: WebSocket2
- Re: WebSocket2
- Re: site-wide headers
- Re: site-wide headers
- Re: #227: Encoding advice for new headers and parameters
- :method | Re: WebSocket2
- Re: #227: Encoding advice for new headers and parameters
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
- Re: #227: Encoding advice for new headers and parameters
Monday, 3 October 2016
Sunday, 2 October 2016
- Re: WebSocket2
- Re: WebSocket2
- Re: WebSocket2
- Re: WebSocket2
- Re: WebSocket2
- Re: WebSocket2
- Re: WebSocket2
- Re: WebSocket2
- Re: WebSocket2
- Re: WebSocket2