Re: alt svc issue #126 clarify invalidation rules wrt altsvc frame from Martin Thomson on 2015-12-13 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from October to December 2015)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 08:29:18 +1100
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: Hervé Ruellan <herve.ruellan@crf.canon.fr>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVpJHYaXiuQZ3+SY7+B2aVr9LdADG3bWHjEmrY29XO_7Q@mail.gmail.com>

On 14 December 2015 at 04:41, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> "Receiving an ALTSVC frame is semantically equivalent to receiving an
> Alt-Svc header field. As a result, the ALTSVC frame causes alternative
> services for the corresponding origin to be replaced. Note that it would be
> unwise to mix use of Alt-Svc header fields with the use of ALTSVC frames, as
> the sequence of receipt might be hard to predict."


WFM

Received on Sunday, 13 December 2015 21:29:47 UTC