- From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 23:33:07 +0100
- To: Cory Benfield <cory@lukasa.co.uk>
- Cc: Jacob Appelbaum <jacob@appelbaum.net>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 04:59:02PM +0000, Cory Benfield wrote: > > > On 28 Nov 2015, at 11:56, Jacob Appelbaum <jacob@appelbaum.net> wrote: > > We solve a real problem with RFC7686 and browsers, as well > > as other software, have a duty of care to implement the solution. > > The browsers part makes sense to me, it really does, and I (and maybe Willy) > would not have objected in the slightest if this was brought up as a > suggestion instead of what felt like a mandate. I don???t object to browsers > refusing to process .onion domains, that makes perfect sense. I care much > more about claiming that the requirement extends to anything that processes > domain names (your ???other software", even if that application makes no > claim to support Tor or actively claims it does not. (...) I confirm that it was my point as well. Thanks Cory for making it clearer than I did :-) Willy
Received on Saturday, 28 November 2015 22:33:36 UTC