- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 11:45:13 +0100
- To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2015-11-12 08:32, Julian Reschke wrote: > Hi there, > > there have been quite a few issues addressed since draft 08, see > <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-latest-from-previous.diff.html>. > > > Right now, we have three open issues > (<https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/labels/alt-svc>): > > "Reconciling MAY/can vs. SHOULD" > (<https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/101>) - this was > discussed during the WG session in Yokohama, but I did not agree with > the outcome. I attempted to address the underlying issue in > <https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/commit/acc3ae3c4290323069501d55ea8cdb5bacdbc6e8> > and currently wait for feedback on it. (And I'd like to have this > resolved before submitting the next draft). > > The two other issues are: > > "alt-svc from https (1.1) to https (1.1)" > (<https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/91>) and "alt-svc vs > the ability to convey the scheme inside the protocol" > (<https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/92>) are related and > were both raised by me. Let's get to them once we have a new draft and > then try to finish up... For these two Mark proposed text that got positive feedback, see <https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/92>. I thus made this change (with minor tuning) and submitted draft 09 which might be suitable for Working Group Last Call... Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 17 November 2015 10:45:49 UTC