- From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>
- Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2015 18:32:47 -0800
- To: Glen Knowles <gknowles@ieee.org>
- Cc: Cory Benfield <cory@lukasa.co.uk>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 15 November 2015 at 15:20, Glen Knowles <gknowles@ieee.org> wrote: >> MUST NOT This phrase, or the phrase "SHALL NOT", mean that the >> definition > is an absolute prohibition of the specification. > > I'm well aware of what a normative MUST NOT means, I'm arguing that it's use > in this case is to strong (or to general) - in no small part because > violating > it is undetectable by the peer. Just because a behavior is undetectable to a peer doesn't it mean it is, or ought to be, allowed. -- Eitan Adler
Received on Monday, 16 November 2015 02:33:46 UTC