- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 11:26:35 +1100
- To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
- Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
OK, let's accept Ted's proposal then; marking the issue as editor-ready. > On 13 Oct 2015, at 6:24 pm, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> wrote: > > On 13/10/2015 1:33 p.m., Mark Nottingham wrote: >> Hi Amos, >> >> I've raised the first issue here as: >> https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/103 >> >> What do you (and others) think about Ted's suggestion? >> > > Works far better than what was there before. If we cant get away from > the singular nature of "demand" this is at least a bit more flexible in > use-case coverage. > >> The rest of it looks like editorial suggestions, so I'll leave them for Tim to take on board. > > Ok. > > Amos > > -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Wednesday, 14 October 2015 00:27:08 UTC