Re: alt-svc issue #83: Alt-Svc Header - hop by hop from Mark Nottingham on 2015-09-20 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from July to September 2015)

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 06:45:08 +1200
To: "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <BEFE801A-A543-4E31-B782-09B7A5B631BB@mnot.net>

I believe so, unless there's more discussion people would like to have here.


> On 20 Sep 2015, at 11:53 pm, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
> mnot: "Discussed in Prague; end-to-end header is useful in the OppSec use case, and it doesn't need to be consistent with the frame. Feeling in room was to close with no action."
> 
> So can we close this issue?
> 
> Best regards, Julian
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

Received on Sunday, 20 September 2015 18:45:35 UTC