- From: Florian Best <http@florianbest.de>
- Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2015 21:58:51 +0200
- To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, fielding@gbiv.com, ylafon@w3.org, julian.reschke@greenbytes.de, barryleiba@computer.org, mnot@mnot.net
- Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
I tested this against a httpd and my report seems invalid. The sentence "the byte positions specified are inclusive" seem to explain it (but not very clear imho!). Am 13.09.2015 um 21:30 schrieb RFC Errata System: > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7233, > "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Range Requests". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7233&eid=4472 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: Florian Best <http@florianbest.de> > > Section: 2.1 > > Original Text > ------------- > o The first and last bytes only (bytes 0 and 9999): > > bytes=0-0,-1 > > Corrected Text > -------------- > o The first and last bytes only (bytes 0 and 9999): > > bytes=0-1,-1 > > Notes > ----- > If the first byte is requested the offset must be 1. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC7233 (draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-26) > -------------------------------------- > Title : Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Range Requests > Publication Date : June 2014 > Author(s) : R. Fielding, Ed., Y. Lafon, Ed., J. Reschke, Ed. > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis APP > Area : Applications > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > >
Received on Sunday, 13 September 2015 19:59:17 UTC