- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 07:07:24 +0000
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
-------- In message <E46B07E8-79F8-43D8-8AB5-ACA2FBAFB400@mnot.net>, Mark Nottingham wri tes: >> I doubt that would happen in reality, there are big incentives to lie. >> >> Leave it at 451 and recommend that the body contains useful details. > >It can (and hopefully will) regardless. The discussion here was to see >whether it'd be useful to make the distinction clear for automated >clients (e.g., Chilling Effects, robots); the response has been "yes, >that would be useful." I'm sure they would find it useful. But only if the censors return 452 to begin with. Did anybody ask them if they're going to ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Monday, 24 August 2015 07:07:48 UTC