On 23 Aug 2015 7:49 am, "Mike Bishop" <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com> wrote: ... with a few others, the general feeling seems to be that we should all change to reject this as broken header framing. > > > > Does anyone have objections and think this should be tolerated by an h2 parser? If not, I don’t know that this qualifies as an erratum, but it would be nice to officially preserve this somewhere. IMO reject is entirely appropriate. -robReceived on Saturday, 22 August 2015 20:12:23 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:46 UTC