W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2015

Re: New Version Notification for draft-benfield-http2-p2p-00.txt

From: Ilari Liusvaara <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 15:54:17 +0300
To: Cory Benfield <cory@lukasa.co.uk>
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20150721125417.GA21581@LK-Perkele-VII>
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 01:48:13PM +0100, Cory Benfield wrote:
> > On 20 Jul 2015, at 17:41, Ilari Liusvaara <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi> wrote:
> 
> Thanks for the feedback Ilari! It’s much appreciated
> 
> > The seemingly only reason server-side SETTINGS_PEER_TO_PEER
> > is if client wants to wait for acknowledge of server support
> > before sending its CLIENT_AUTHORITY frames. But omitting that
> > wait would just cause the CLIENT_AUTHORITY frames to be harmlessly
> > ignored.
> 
> That’s not the reason. The reason the server would emit SETTINGS_PEER_TO_PEER
> is to indicate that it’s willing to accept PUSH_PROMISE frames sent from the
> client. Note that this spec forbids the client from pushing streams without
> that setting being sent by the server.

Can't server just set SETTINGS_PUSH_PROMISE to 1 after obtaining
SETTINGS_PEER_TO_PEER 1 from client? And SETTINGS_PEER_TO_PEER 1
from client would mean that the server MAY do that?


-Ilari
Received on Tuesday, 21 July 2015 12:54:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:46 UTC