W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2015

Re: dont-revalidate Cache-Control header

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 10:28:59 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnU0+X4eEMoUtwn=rmU5nOWfTYcQxsFwOKJixN0upFOh3Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Guille -bisho- <bishillo@gmail.com>
Cc: Ben Maurer <ben.maurer@gmail.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 15 July 2015 at 10:13, Guille -bisho- <bishillo@gmail.com> wrote:
> If corruption is still a concern (not sure if it is because https will give
> us better integrity guarantees), what about an optional checksum?
> static=<type>:<hash> like static=SHA1:###... ?


At that point you are reinventing SRI.  Which suggests that SRI is a
signal that user agents could use, and might be all that is necessary.
Received on Wednesday, 15 July 2015 17:29:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:46 UTC