Re: dont-revalidate Cache-Control header

On 15 July 2015 at 10:13, Guille -bisho- <> wrote:
> If corruption is still a concern (not sure if it is because https will give
> us better integrity guarantees), what about an optional checksum?
> static=<type>:<hash> like static=SHA1:###... ?

At that point you are reinventing SRI.  Which suggests that SRI is a
signal that user agents could use, and might be all that is necessary.

Received on Wednesday, 15 July 2015 17:29:26 UTC