On 15 July 2015 at 10:13, Guille -bisho- <bishillo@gmail.com> wrote: > If corruption is still a concern (not sure if it is because https will give > us better integrity guarantees), what about an optional checksum? > static=<type>:<hash> like static=SHA1:###... ? At that point you are reinventing SRI. Which suggests that SRI is a signal that user agents could use, and might be all that is necessary.Received on Wednesday, 15 July 2015 17:29:26 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:46 UTC