- From: Cory Benfield <cory@lukasa.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 11:58:17 +0100
- To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
- Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 8 July 2015 at 11:30, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> wrote: > If you have a strong use case for it I suggest writing up a SETTINGS > extension which can be negotiated between two endpoints. That way 2->1.1 > gateway devices can negotiate its absence for the 1.1 hops and things > still work. I can certainly see a case for it. I'll see if I can whip up an ID sometime today to use as a starting point for discussion on this. Cory
Received on Wednesday, 8 July 2015 10:58:48 UTC