- From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
- Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 22:06:14 +0100
- To: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>, Xiaoyin Liu <xiaoyin.l@outlook.com>, Dan Anderson <dan-anderson@cox.net>, "Walter H." <walter.h@mathemainzel.info>
- CC: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Hiya, On 31/03/15 21:49, Adrien de Croy wrote: > > So whilst very interesting, I don't know if we can really draw too much > from this study alone. It would be very interesting to see the results > redone at say yearly intervals. Yep, longitudinal studies are valuable in things like this. I'd be surprised if there wasn't being done by someone right now tbh. Meanwhile, the take-away is clearly that MitM deployment is one of those things that's (ab:-)used about 0.41% of the time and should be treated as such and that claims to the contrary are anecdotal. S.
Received on Tuesday, 31 March 2015 21:06:48 UTC