Re: Header addition with HTTP 2.0

Yes. I am aware of that. With HTTP 2.0 even URL is inside the headers frame.
Basically it would be similar to adding a new header.
We have to decode with one context and re-encode with another context, so
that dynamic tables would not be messed up.

On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Bence Béky <bnc@chromium.org> wrote:

> [re-posting from the right address]
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 5:34 PM, Vimala Tadepalli <vimla.c@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > In HTTP 2.0, can i do this?
> > If a header is added at firewall, client and server dynamic tables might
> go
> > out of sync. Will it cause any issues?
>
> Good question.  My understanding is that the firewall is supposed to
> re-encode the header.  That is, it should maintain a dynamic table on
> its connection with the client that stays in sync with that of the
> client, decode the header block using this dynamic table, and
> re-encode it towards the server using a context that is in sync with
> the server.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bence
>
>