W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2015

Re: Header addition with HTTP 2.0

From: Vimala Tadepalli <vimla.c@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 13:14:52 -0700
Message-ID: <CAKwtvnDh+mmJjf0V6UzZimX7ng0Um8StTdQd=Ej=-rHeWGjLOQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bence Béky <bnc@chromium.org>
Cc: HTTP <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Yes. I am aware of that. With HTTP 2.0 even URL is inside the headers frame.
Basically it would be similar to adding a new header.
We have to decode with one context and re-encode with another context, so
that dynamic tables would not be messed up.

On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Bence Béky <bnc@chromium.org> wrote:

> [re-posting from the right address]
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 5:34 PM, Vimala Tadepalli <vimla.c@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > In HTTP 2.0, can i do this?
> > If a header is added at firewall, client and server dynamic tables might
> go
> > out of sync. Will it cause any issues?
>
> Good question.  My understanding is that the firewall is supposed to
> re-encode the header.  That is, it should maintain a dynamic table on
> its connection with the client that stays in sync with that of the
> client, decode the header block using this dynamic table, and
> re-encode it towards the server using a context that is in sync with
> the server.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bence
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 31 March 2015 20:15:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:43 UTC