On Mar 29, 2015 8:34 AM, "Brendan Long" <self@brendanlong.com> wrote: > > I don't think the semantics I want are the same. RFC 7240's "wait" > indicates how long a client is willing to wait for a server to finish > processing, but what I'm looking for is a way to tell the server that we > want it to wait, even though it could respond now. > > Maybe the "Wait-Until: available" or "Wait-Until: etags-change" variant > makes this more clear? If-None-Match in combination with Prefer: wait does exactly what you want here.Received on Monday, 30 March 2015 15:21:08 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:43 UTC