Oh yea! -=R On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Mike, > > On 23 March 2015 at 11:54, Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com> > wrote: > > One inconsistency in the revised text: You still say at line 2444 that > initiating new requests "is inadvisable." It's not just inadvisable, it's > MUST NOT at line 2353. > > Fixed. > > > I'll also note that the seamless hand-off is a perfect reason for the > DRAINING frame extension that was also floated during that discussion -- > DRAINING could be defined as a hint that the client should spin up a > secondary connection because a GOAWAY is coming soon. No harm if the > client doesn't understand or obey it -- the loss is strictly its own. > > That sounds like a great plan to me. I look forward to someone > proposing this extension some day. > >
Received on Monday, 23 March 2015 20:03:37 UTC