W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2015

Re: #44: alt-svc frame on pushed streams

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 09:41:49 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVQPQqpZR85a1k=zX4kt6yETzxKqqk8nJbcc0K8mo9w7A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

On 16 March 2015 at 22:50, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> Any objection to stating that they MUST be ignored by recipients?

Is there any reason that server-initiated streams need to be made
special?  I mean, once the standard response handling has started, I
can't imagine any reason for treating push specially.

Received on Tuesday, 17 March 2015 16:42:16 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Martin Thomson: "Re: Clarification on HPACK dynamic table size increases?"
Previous message: Hervé Ruellan: "Re: Clarification on HPACK dynamic table size increases?"
In reply to: Mark Nottingham: "#44: alt-svc frame on pushed streams"
Next in thread: Patrick McManus: "Re: #44: alt-svc frame on pushed streams"
Reply: Patrick McManus: "Re: #44: alt-svc frame on pushed streams"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:43 UTC