- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 19:47:00 +1100
- To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Hi PHK, > On 10 Mar 2015, at 6:03 pm, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: > > -------- > In message <736BDD24-D731-4F39-B9E0-6184E9B285D1@mnot.net>, Mark Nottingham wri > tes: >> ... is at: >> https://github.com/httpwg/wg-materials/blob/gh-pages/ietf92/agenda.md >> >> As always, suggestions, etc. welcome. > > Who is going to open issues based on Bob Briscoes critique ? Martin will apply editorial suggestions as he’s able (constrained by where we’re at in the process); anything more will need to be an errata, or held for the next update. We (the IETF) don’t have a “living standard” process, for better or worse. One of the things we as a WG might discuss is how we can collect suggestions / issues for our specs, outside of the errata system (which has some widely-recognised limitations that people are working on now, but even after that it’s likely to be limited). This might be as simple as keeping a repo issues list open for collecting those issues, as we’ve done for h1. Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Tuesday, 10 March 2015 08:47:28 UTC