- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 08:54:15 +0100
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
- CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2015-02-13 06:36, Mark Nottingham wrote: > Greg, > >> On 13 Feb 2015, at 12:06 pm, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> wrote: >> >> On 11 February 2015 at 18:45, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: >> The best fix of course would be to fix the list. I don't understand why that is so hard. >> >> Wow, I really think the IETF needs to consider their process if simple stupid things like this can be detected by the process and still not fixed. >> >> I thought we had just deferred the fixing of the table until a breaking binary change - and surely updating from h2-14 to h2-17 and then eventually to h2 is a binary breaking change that would have allowed us to fix the table? > > Those aren't breaking changes -- i.e., they don't change the format. > ... For a definition of "format" I happen to disagree with :-)
Received on Friday, 13 February 2015 07:54:50 UTC