Re: New Version Notification - draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-11.txt

PLEASE, if the static table is open for _minor_ modifications, also
consider these two (I can hear the moans from here):
1) Lexicographical ordering ("accept" should come before "accept-charset")
2) Default header values instead of nothing at all (see

At a minimum, perhaps some wording like in the PR for #1, as I'm sure its
going to cause implementation issues..

- Robby

On 2/10/15, 2:06 PM, "Julian Reschke" <> wrote:

>On 2015-02-10 19:07, Hervé Ruellan wrote:
>> I overlooked this specific comment.
>> I just created a pull request for handling it:

>> I can publish a new draft for this and any other comment I would have
>> missed.
>> Cheers,
>> Hervé.
>Thanks a lot. That explains the state of the table (another oversight is
>the presence of T-E, no?).
>I'd still prefer to actually fix the table, given the fact that
>implementations will have to update the ALPN identifier anyway...
>Best regards, Julian

Received on Tuesday, 10 February 2015 20:30:19 UTC