- From: Hervé Ruellan <herve.ruellan@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:07:28 +0100
- To: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
I overlooked this specific comment.
I just created a pull request for handling it:
https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/pull/714
I can publish a new draft for this and any other comment I would have
missed.
Cheers,
Hervé.
On 02/10/2015 05:01 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2015-02-10 16:36, Barry Leiba wrote:
>> This version is ready, and addresses all the comments you think need
>> to be addressed?
>>
>> Barry
>> ...
>
>
> For the record: the static table still contains a header field name
> that's not registered ("refresh"), and I doubt that it's actually used a
> lot on the wire.
>
> I asked about this during LC
> (<https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2015JanMar/0074.html>),
> and it would be nice if there was at least an explanation why this can
> not be fixed at this time.
>
> Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 10 February 2015 18:07:58 UTC