Re: Call for adoption: draft-reschke-httpauth-auth-info-00

On 2015-02-04 17:46, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2015-02-02 15:08, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef wrote:
>> This document does not define any semantics associated with these
>> header, which means that the document that uses these header will be the
>> one that must address the information leak issue.
>> I do not see why we would restrict a future use of these headers based
>> on the Digest usage; this seems odd to me.
>> Regards,
>>   Rifaat
> Well, the goal for me was not to define anything new, but just to
> extract what we have already into something that can be maintained
> separately from DIGEST. As such, Hervé's comment made sense to me, and I
> updated the editor's copy accordingly:
> <>
> Maybe other potential users of Auth-Info (Yutaka & Alexey) could state
> whether having this constraint would affect their ability to use
> Authentication-Info?
> Assuming that is not the case, I'd like to declare victory, submit a new
> draft, and ask Mark to start a WGLC...
> Best regards, Julian
> ...

Seeing no additional feedback, I went ahead and submitted draft 01.

Best regards, Julian

Received on Friday, 6 February 2015 10:02:12 UTC