Re: draft-reschke-http-cice vs discussions in Toronto @ IETF 90: use as response header field

> On 31 Jan 2015, at 10:02 pm, Julian Reschke <> wrote:
> Hi there,
> the minutes (<>) say:
>> MarK: Different meaning in the request vs. response, makes him twitchy
> Mark, could you elaborate on that a bit? Do you believe that changing something which currently is a request header field only to be used as response header field as well to be a problem in general? Why?

Experience with Cache-Control -- people get confused over what the pertinent directives are in each direction, and misuse it as a result.


Mark Nottingham

Received on Monday, 2 February 2015 06:39:57 UTC