W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2015

Re: Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 10:03:22 -0800
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXWghptfu9=cQiORLxwKWJHKvRfyvfa1QvLtC7FQAO1XA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "httpbis-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <httpbis-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, "draft-ietf-httpbis-http2.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-httpbis-http2.all@tools.ietf.org>
On 28 January 2015 at 00:24, Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> wrote:
> "The server MUST include a value in the ":authority" header field for which
> the server is authoritative (see Section 10.1).  If a client receives a
> PUSH_PROMISE for a resource for which the server is not authoritative, it
> MUST respond with a stream error (Section 5.4.2) of type PROTOCOL_ERROR."
> (Or maybe STREAM_REFUSED?  Since these requests should not be processed at
> all by the client.)

WFM.  (STREAM_REFUSED doesn't add value in this context: we don't need
to worry about retries, because retries are allowed anyway.)

I'll keep my proposed MUST NOT; no harm in having extra coverage for
something important like this.
Received on Wednesday, 28 January 2015 18:03:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:42 UTC