- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 09:32:35 -0800
- To: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
- Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 27 January 2015 at 01:01, Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com> wrote: > > Willy - I think the intention is that this is used whether or not there is > TLS in play, but that the ALPN token used in Tunnel-Protocol wouldn't match > what is in the ALPN in any tunneled TLS (if any). The opposite of that. See HTTP/2. > E.g. if tunneling SMTP over TLS, you'd advertise smtps in the > Tunnel-Protocol header, and smtp in the ALPN field in the client helo in > TLS. If "smtps" identifies a profile of SMTP that runs over TLS, both places would use that string. The intent is to have the two match exactly.
Received on Tuesday, 27 January 2015 17:33:04 UTC