W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2015

Re: Alissa Cooper's Yes on draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-16: (with COMMENT)

From: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 12:26:46 +0100
Message-ID: <CAH_y2NGo-WA65K8bhL-2KF-MnG6MhHgADfq+-5q1SABEjjuwRA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, httpbis-chairs@tools.ietf.org, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, draft-ietf-httpbis-http2.all@tools.ietf.org
On 23 January 2015 at 12:13, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> wrote:

> We could introduce a RESET state, which means that CLOSE will always be
> entered gracefully and there will be no late packets.   RESET could then
> have defined timeout before entering CLOSE.

Actually, if we made RESET an acknowledged frame, then we could avoid the
timeout completely as once you have both sent and received a RESET you can
enter close gracefully.

I know it is late to be hammering on this bugbear, but I'll prepare a PR
none the less.


Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>  @  Webtide - *an Intalio subsidiary*
http://eclipse.org/jetty HTTP, SPDY, Websocket server and client that scales
http://www.webtide.com  advice and support for jetty and cometd.
Received on Friday, 23 January 2015 11:27:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:42 UTC