On 23 January 2015 at 12:13, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> wrote: > We could introduce a RESET state, which means that CLOSE will always be > entered gracefully and there will be no late packets. RESET could then > have defined timeout before entering CLOSE. Actually, if we made RESET an acknowledged frame, then we could avoid the timeout completely as once you have both sent and received a RESET you can enter close gracefully. I know it is late to be hammering on this bugbear, but I'll prepare a PR none the less. cheers -- Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> @ Webtide - *an Intalio subsidiary* http://eclipse.org/jetty HTTP, SPDY, Websocket server and client that scales http://www.webtide.com advice and support for jetty and cometd.
Received on Friday, 23 January 2015 11:27:15 UTC