W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2015

Re: [IANA #801638] Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-16.txt> (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) to Proposed Standard

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 10:16:46 -0800
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXNOdB6OZghNnJZt8PNQpk2qwRkRMXdh=4b0A8GHKTjxQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: drafts-lastcall@iana.org
Cc: httpbis-chairs@tools.ietf.org, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, draft-ietf-httpbis-http2.all@tools.ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Thanks Pearl,

I assume that the "NOT OK" refers to the need for expert review.  Or
are you concerned about us requesting a specific number (421) for the
last action?

On 13 January 2015 at 09:50, Pearl Liang via RT
<drafts-lastcall@iana.org> wrote:
> a new method will be registered as follows:
> Method Name: PRI
> Safe: No
> Idempotent: No
> Reference: [ RFC-to-be ]
> Question: just to double check if the new requested method "PRI" is an abbreviation.
> It appears that RFC7231 does not require a full name.

That is correct.  Method names don't require a full name.  In this
case, a full name could be confusing, since this is a defensive
registration only.
Received on Tuesday, 13 January 2015 18:17:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:42 UTC