Re: [IANA #801638] Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-16.txt> (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) to Proposed Standard

Thanks Pearl,

I assume that the "NOT OK" refers to the need for expert review.  Or
are you concerned about us requesting a specific number (421) for the
last action?

On 13 January 2015 at 09:50, Pearl Liang via RT
<> wrote:
> a new method will be registered as follows:
> Method Name: PRI
> Safe: No
> Idempotent: No
> Reference: [ RFC-to-be ]
> Question: just to double check if the new requested method "PRI" is an abbreviation.
> It appears that RFC7231 does not require a full name.

That is correct.  Method names don't require a full name.  In this
case, a full name could be confusing, since this is a defensive
registration only.

Received on Tuesday, 13 January 2015 18:17:13 UTC