W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2015

Re: Server Push used for long polling

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 13:27:54 -0800
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWo-oUh4=GmOmXHEe8FNNPAwyVNLffm7KBXc3m0RGwG7w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

On 12 January 2015 at 09:03, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> It still has a hacky feeling to me; for instance, an intermediary wouldn't
> be able to distinguish this case from a request that actually takes very
> long to execute.


Indeed, but we do have Prefer: wait=10000000000 if you want to include
such a signal.

Received on Monday, 12 January 2015 21:28:21 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jason T. Greene: "Re: SETTINGS_MAX_HEADER_LIST_SIZE, was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-16.txt> (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) to Proposed Standard"
Previous message: Martin Thomson: "Re: SETTINGS_MAX_HEADER_LIST_SIZE, was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-16.txt> (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) to Proposed Standard"
In reply to: Julian Reschke: "Re: Server Push used for long polling"
Next in thread: Greg Wilkins: "Re: Server Push used for long polling"
Reply: Greg Wilkins: "Re: Server Push used for long polling"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:42 UTC