- From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
- Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 17:43:07 +0100
- To: David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com>, "'HTTP Working Group'" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 8 January 2015 16:43:37 UTC
David, On 1/8/15 5:04 PM, David Morris wrote: > I still like: > > 451 Forbidden for Policy Reasons > > but if 'Forbidden' is a concern then either > 451 Blocked for Policy Reasons > or > 451 Access Blocked for Policy Reasons ... so that what can be done? "Policy reasons" could mean anything from "the administrator is *required* to block the content" to "the administrator *wants* to block the content". My understanding, and again, Tim should comment more is that he is aiming more toward the former and not the latter. That is- there is this component of *external* demand. I can see the value, by the way, in having that, although I am skeptical about how useful it will be. But I agree with Mark Nottingham. If others think it will be useful, please by all means let's go ahead. Eliot
Received on Thursday, 8 January 2015 16:43:37 UTC